mUltimate Chopin

Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Verbal indications
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

Verbal indications

b. 22

composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major

..

Under the f crotchet in FES there is a pencilled ambiguous mark, resembling .

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FES

b. 38

composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major

 & marcato in A

FE

GE

EE
..

We give both indications after A. The shifts performed in FE were probably forced by lack of space under the bottom stave. The notation was subject to further non-authentic reinterpretations in GE and EE.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE

b. 40

composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major

No indication in A

in FE (→GE,EE)
..

Chopin added  while proofreading FE (→GE,EE).

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

issues: Authentic corrections of FE

b. 41

composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major

in A (→FE→EE)

in GE
..

In GE, same as in the entire Op. 10, the dim. abbreviation was replaced with dimin., which Chopin used much less frequently.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions

b. 61

composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major

in A (→FE→EE,GE1→GE2)

No marking in GE3 (→GE4)
..

Omission of  in GE3 (→GE4) is probably a mistake.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE