Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


Articulation, Accents, Hairpins

b. 22

composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major

Accent in A (→FEGE) & EE4

No mark in EE3

..

Omission of the accent in EE3 is certainly a mistake, corrected in EE4.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in EE

b. 23-24

composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major

No marks in A (→FEGE,EE)

Our suggestion

..

We suggest to add accents and dots over the chords in the L.H. after analogous bars 9-10.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

b. 29-31

composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major

Four dots in A & GE1

Two dots in FE (→EE)

GE3 (→GE4)

..

In FE (→EE), the staccato dots in bar 31 were overlooked. The mistake was corrected in GE1, yet in subsequent GE,s, again one dot in each of these two bars was omitted. 

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE , Errors in GE , GE revisions

b. 32

composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major

Accents in A

No marks in FE (→GE,EE)

..

The missing accents in FE (→GE,EE) are certainly a result of the engraver's inattention.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE

b. 33-35

composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major

Four dots in A

Three in FE

Three in GE

Two in EE

..

In all editions, a few staccato dots next to quavers were omitted. They are undoubtedly the engravers' inaccuracies.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies