b. 1-4
|
composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major
..
The pedalling of these bars was added by Chopin during a proofreading of FE (→GE,EE). The editors have doubts whether the moment of the pedal's release in bar 4 was correctly marked (due to harmonic reasons). Therefore, we suggest to release the pedal slightly earlier. Most probably, the reviser of GE3 (→GE4) thought alike, moving the mark at the end of bar 3. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: No initial dynamic marking , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||
b. 1-6
|
composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major
..
 
category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
|||||||||
b. 2
|
composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major
..
The wedges over d and a are a result of a mistake of the engraver of FE, who misinterpreted the '1's of the fingering. The first of them was removed in the last proofreading of FE (→EE), yet in GE it remained unchanged. In the main text we give the fingering after A, yet we leave the inclusion of the digit over d to the performer's discretion, as in subsequent, similar figures (bars 4, 6, 8), Chopin did not once repeat it and it cannot be excluded that it referred to the original version of this fragment. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||
b. 2-3
|
composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major
..
In the main text we give the fingering of the L.H. written by Chopin in A. Only some of these digits were correctly reproduced in FE (→GE,EE). The editors assume that the most probable reason for this state of affairs is rather the engraver's negligence than Chopin's proofreading. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |