|
b. 26
|
composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major
..
Adding c to the remaining elements of the chord is almost certainly a result of a misunderstanding of the notation of A by the engraver of FE (→GE,EE). category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||
|
b. 28
|
composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major
..
The slur in the L.H. was added – probably by Chopin – in a proofreading of FE (→EE,GE1→GE2). The slur clearly indicates continuation in the next bar (on a new page), in which, however, there is no relevant mark. In EE, in which bars 28-29 are not separated, the slur was led to the beginning of bar 29. In turn, in GE3 (→GE4) the slur's range was limited to three semiquavers. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||
|
b. 29
|
composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major
..
The slur at the end of bar 28, added – at the end of the page – by Chopin in a proofreading of FE (→EE,GE1→GE2), is unfinished in bar 29. According to us, the inaccuracy concerns this bar and this is how we interpret the notation of FE (→GE1→GE2). In EE bars 28-29 are not separated and the slur reaches the D-A fifth. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||
|
b. 29-30
|
composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||
|
b. 29
|
composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major
..
The D minim is most probably the original version, left in A due to distraction. To the main text we adopt the semibreve, being probably a result of Chopin's proofreading of FE (→GE,EE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
