According to us, the end of the slur in FE1 is printed inaccurately; the slur in bar 67, which is in the next line, suggests to continue the slur from the previous bar. However, both in FE2 and EE it was the scope of the slur in bar 66 that was assumed as the correct one. Moreover, in those editions the whole sign was moved under the notes, which is almost certainly contrary to the notation of [A1]. The slurs of GE present probably a slightly different version of this place in [A2]. The version of EE2 is a compilation of the notation of EE1 and GE.
In the main text we give the most probable interpretation of the slur of FE1; we consider that version the closest to the authentic notation among all source versions.
category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Interpretations within context; Differences between sources
issues: EE revisions, Inaccuracies in FE, Placement of markings, FE revisions
notation: Slurs