Page: 
Source: 
p. 6, b. 41-56
p. 1
p. 2
p. 3, b. 1-10
p. 4, b. 11-24
p. 5, b. 25-40
p. 6, b. 41-56
p. 7, b. 57-72
p. 8, b. 73-79
p. 9, b. 79-91
p. 10
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
Main text
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Second French edition
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Second impression of EE1
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Second French edition
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Second impression of EE1
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy


  b. 48

Rhythmic notation in FE1

FE2 & EE1

GE

EE2

The notation of the upper voice in FE1 –  rhythm with the quaver being moved outside the last quaver of the lower voice – indicates the engraver's error, who placed the notes in accordance with the double dotted rhythm (as in GE), yet he added only one dot and stem to them. The error was revised in FE2 and EE1 by correcting the placement of notes and not their rhythmic values. In EE2 the double dotted rhythm was introduced, without changing the layout of the notes.

Compare the passage in the sources »

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE

notation: Rhythm