Verbal indications
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor
..
Not being sure of the spelling of the last name of the princess, Chopin asked Fontana (in the letter dated 6 Oct. 1841) to find it out from the princess herself or from her governess: "I don't know how Mme Czerniszew spells her name [...]: is it Tscher, or Tcher? [...], whether it is Elisabeth, and whether Tschernischef, or ff [...]". As GE and FE2 differ in that respect, it seems natural to assume that the later-published FE2 presents the spelling checked by Chopin. The dedication in EE2 was repeated after GE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Dedications |
||||||
b. 17
|
composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor
..
The indication ten. was probably added by Chopin in [A2] (→GE) to make the notation more precise. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||
b. 31-32
|
composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor
..
Placing at the beginning of a new phrase seems to be much more natural. It cannot be ruled out that the sign in [A2] (→GE) was written by Chopin at the transition of the bars and also included the preceding minim in his intentions. That type of notation, nowadays incomprehensible, can sometimes be found in Chopin’s works. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Centrally placed marks |
||||||
b. 33
|
composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor
..
The indication cresc. is in GE and is an element of probably the latter of the two authentic versions of dynamic markings in bars 33-35. That indication was also added in EE2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||
b. 35
|
composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor
..
The hairpins and the mark are in GE and are an element of probably the latter of two authentic versions of dynamic markings in bars 33-35. The markings were also added in EE2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |