Ornaments
|
b. 9
|
composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor
..
The ornament-free version of FE (→EE) is probably earlier, although errors in the reading of [A1] cannot be ruled out completely (they may have resulted from e.g. corrections or deletions in the manuscript). As our main text we give the grace note with the arpeggio, on the basis of GE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
||||||||
|
b. 13
|
composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor
..
We propose that the arpeggio mark be added here, in line with the notation used in GE in the analogous bar 9. Arpeggio with the doubled lower note is very characteristic of Chopin, and he often omitted the arpeggio marks for broader chords. Therefore, it is very probable that - having marked the arpeggio upon its first appearance - Chopin considered it obvious in analogous places. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 23
|
composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor
..
The grace note in the form of a small crotchet is certainly an error of EE1, corrected in EE2. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 51
|
composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor
..
It is hard to determine the reason of this difference. The lack of arpeggio in GE may be a result of the engraver's oversight or the very Chopin's in [A2]. The intentional omission of the arpeggio seems to be the least plausible possibility. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
|
b. 71
|
composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor
..
We propose to complete the arpeggio mark on the basis of the notation used in GE in analogous bar 9. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
