Issues : FE revisions
|
b. 56
|
composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor
..
FE1 and GE are lacking the category imprint: issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , Omission of current key accidentals , FE revisions |
|||||||||
|
b. 59
|
composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor
..
In FE1 there are no naturals lowering f category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , FE revisions |
|||||||||
|
b. 60
|
composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor
..
In FE1 there are no naturals before the 5th and 7th quavers (both are necessary in the layout adopted in this edition). The signs were added in FE2. The correct text is also in EE and GE (with one natural f). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , Omission of current key accidentals , FE revisions |
|||||||||
|
b. 62-65
|
composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor
..
The slurring in bars 62-63 may be considered as authentic both in FE1 and GE. The first of them were then recreated in FE2 and EE, yet with a change of layout – slurs in bars 63-65 are placed below the notes. According to the editors, it is highly unlikely that it follows Chopin's notation. On the basis of that, it may be supposed that also the slurs in GE, which are running under the notes, were placed over the notes in the autograph. In the main text we give the alleged notation of [A2]. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Placement of markings , GE revisions , FE revisions |
|||||||||
|
b. 66
|
composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor
..
According to us, the end of the slur in FE1 is printed inaccurately; the slur in bar 67, which is in the next line, suggests to continue the slur from the previous bar. However, both in FE2 and EE it was the scope of the slur in bar 66 that was assumed as the correct one. Moreover, in those editions the whole sign was moved under the notes, which is almost certainly contrary to the notation of [A1]. The slurs of GE present probably a slightly different version of this place in [A2]. The version of EE2 is a compilation of the notation of EE1 and GE. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , Placement of markings , FE revisions |
lowering d
1 to d1. This patent inaccuracy was corrected in 
