Issues : Inaccuracies in FE
|
b. 38
|
composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor
..
The notation of FE and GE is certainly inaccurate, which was corrected by the reviser of EE. Similarly in bar 46. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE |
|||
|
b. 39-50
|
composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor
..
We preserve the layout of FE1, in which the slurs embracing the passages of the L.H. are over the notes, which certainly recreates the notation of [A1]. In FE2 and EE the slurs were moved under the notes, most probably due to graphic problems. Therefore, we can suppose that the slurs under the passages in GE also do not follow the authentic notation in [A2]. category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies |
|||
|
b. 40
|
composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor
..
In FE1 there is no category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , Omission of current key accidentals , FE revisions |
|||
|
b. 46
|
composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor
..
The notation of FE and GE is certainly inaccurate, which was corrected by the reviser of EE. Similarly in bar 38. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE |
|||
|
b. 48
|
composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , Omission of current key accidentals , FE revisions |
in front of the last quaver. As far as the melody is concerned, an f
2 would not be possible here, but taking into account analogous situations in bars 44 and 48 the omission of the accidental has to be considered the most likely version. Adequate additions were introduced into 
