![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Errors in FE
b. 22-23
|
composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor
..
Lack of sustained B in FE is doubtless a mistake, as we can conclude from the presence of the tie in GE (and EE) and from analogous bars, e.g. 8-9 and 12-13. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE |
|||||||
b. 22
|
composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor
..
The fact that FE (→EE) have got a mistaken version here is testififed by the version of GE and a hand-written correction in FEJ. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Errors in FE , Annotations in FEJ |
|||||||
b. 22-23
|
composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor
..
Lack of sustained B in FE is doubtless a mistake, as we can conclude from the presence of the tie in GE (and EE) and from analogous bars, e.g. 8-9 and 12-13. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
|||||||
b. 42
|
composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we propose a more precise notation of the 2nd half of the bar, considering the elements of the most precise sources of notation in similar situations – FE1 in bar 8 and GE in bar 22. In the described bar, we propose to include both e category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Errors in FE , Inaccuracies in GE , Errors in EE |
|||||||
b. 43
|
composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor
..
In FE1 the notes of the 2nd crotchet c2-a category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , FE revisions |