Page: 
Source: 
p. 5, b. 68-85
p. 1, b. 1-18
p. 2, b. 19-35
p. 3, b. 36-51
p. 4, b. 52-67
p. 5, b. 68-85
p. 6, b. 86-103
Main text
Main text
JC - Jędrzejewicz Copy
PE - First Polish Edition
EF - Editions by Fontana
FEF - French edition by Fontana
GEF - German edition by Fontana
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
JC - Jędrzejewicz Copy
PE - First Polish Edition
EF - Editions by Fontana
FEF - French edition by Fontana
GEF - German edition by Fontana
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 81

No markings in JC & EF

Slur & dots in PE

Possible interpretation of PE

In the main text we give the slur of PE, undoubtedly drawn from [A]. However, one can have doubts concerning the correct reading of the autograph's notation in PE. The slurs over the dots tend to embrace only the notes marked in this way, usually of the same pitch (cf. bars 8-10, 16, 59). Chopin's slurs in similar contexts are generally lacking precision, which often impedes their interpretation, cf., e.g., the Mazurka in G minor, Op. 24 No. 1, bar 21. Therefore, it is possible that in this case the slur was supposed to embrace only five quavers (starting from the second one) in Chopin's intentions.

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues:

notation: Slurs