Page: 
Source: 
p. 5, b. 68-85
p. 1, b. 1-18
p. 2, b. 19-35
p. 3, b. 36-51
p. 4, b. 52-67
p. 5, b. 68-85
p. 6, b. 86-103
Main text
Main text
JC - Jędrzejewicz Copy
PE - First Polish Edition
EF - Editions by Fontana
FEF - French edition by Fontana
GEF - German edition by Fontana
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
JC - Jędrzejewicz Copy
PE - First Polish Edition
EF - Editions by Fontana
FEF - French edition by Fontana
GEF - German edition by Fontana
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 68-69

Rhythmic notation in JC, interpretation

EF

PE

The rhythmic notation of the 2nd and 3rd beats of those bars cause substantial problems as in bars 52-53 and analog. The analysis of the notation of JC suggests that Chopin initially wrote only four quavers in each hand in [AI] and then, in a simplified manner, separated some of the notes by extending their stems over the beams (a similar notation is to be found in the finished autograph of the Polonaise in F minor, WN 12, bars 23-24). The notation of EF is an alternative attempt to decipher the notation of [AI]. For the main text we adopt the notation of PE with a clearly highlighted melodic voice.

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in JC

notation: Rhythm