Page: 
Source: 
p. 4, b. 52-67
p. 1, b. 1-18
p. 2, b. 19-35
p. 3, b. 36-51
p. 4, b. 52-67
p. 5, b. 68-85
p. 6, b. 86-103
Main text
Main text
JC - Jędrzejewicz Copy
PE - First Polish Edition
EF - Editions by Fontana
FEF - French edition by Fontana
GEF - German edition by Fontana
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
JC - Jędrzejewicz Copy
PE - First Polish Edition
EF - Editions by Fontana
FEF - French edition by Fontana
GEF - German edition by Fontana
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 67

Small crotchet in JC

Acciaccatura in EF

No ornament in PE

Lack of the grace note in PE does not seem to be a mistake – Chopin probably resigned from it, while writing [A] (maybe he did not want to repeat the ploy from bar 16 and analog.?). It is hard to determine which form of the grace note – a crotchet or a slashed quaver – was featured in [AI]. Moreover, Chopin was not too accurate in writing grace notes: small non-slashed quavers, and even crotchets, may sometimes indicate short ornaments, which, according to the rules, should have a form of a slashed quaver. 

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues:

notation: Pitch