Page: 
Source: 
p. 4, b. 52-67
p. 1, b. 1-18
p. 2, b. 19-35
p. 3, b. 36-51
p. 4, b. 52-67
p. 5, b. 68-85
p. 6, b. 86-103
Main text
Main text
JC - Jędrzejewicz Copy
PE - First Polish Edition
EF - Editions by Fontana
FEF - French edition by Fontana
GEF - German edition by Fontana
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
JC - Jędrzejewicz Copy
PE - First Polish Edition
EF - Editions by Fontana
FEF - French edition by Fontana
GEF - German edition by Fontana
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link Main text


  b. 62

No indications in JC

più  in EF

 in PE

The indication più  in EF is probably non-authentic, same as  which precedes it in bar 60. It is worth mentioning that despite the fact that the dynamic relation defined with those indications could be generally assumed as compatible with cresc. and  in PE, the overall impression is totally different: the notation of PE is more precise in details (crescendos in bars 59 and 61), at the same time, it leaves more freedom by not determining the dynamics in bar 60; it also indicates the climax ( in bar 62) more clearly. 

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues:

notation: Verbal indications