Page: 
Source: 
p. 4, b. 52-67
p. 1, b. 1-18
p. 2, b. 19-35
p. 3, b. 36-51
p. 4, b. 52-67
p. 5, b. 68-85
p. 6, b. 86-103
Main text
Main text
JC - Jędrzejewicz Copy
PE - First Polish Edition
EF - Editions by Fontana
FEF - French edition by Fontana
GEF - German edition by Fontana
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
JC - Jędrzejewicz Copy
PE - First Polish Edition
EF - Editions by Fontana
FEF - French edition by Fontana
GEF - German edition by Fontana
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 52-53

No slurs in JC & EF

Slurs in PE

Supplement suggested by the editors

The slurs over the motifs filling the 1st beat of those bars constitute another element enriching the notation of [A] (→PE). In this source, there are no separate slurs for the L.H., which is a result of a different graphic layout in which the part of the R.H. is written partially on the lower staff. We add the slurs, as in bar 60 Chopin used a separate slur for analogous figure in the L.H. in the graphic layout adopted by us. In this type of context, using one or two slurs does not have any impact on the performance (cf. bars 32-35).

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues:

notation: Slurs