Page: 
Source: 
p. 3, b. 36-51
p. 1, b. 1-18
p. 2, b. 19-35
p. 3, b. 36-51
p. 4, b. 52-67
p. 5, b. 68-85
p. 6, b. 86-103
Main text
Main text
JC - Jędrzejewicz Copy
PE - First Polish Edition
EF - Editions by Fontana
FEF - French edition by Fontana
GEF - German edition by Fontana
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
JC - Jędrzejewicz Copy
PE - First Polish Edition
EF - Editions by Fontana
FEF - French edition by Fontana
GEF - German edition by Fontana
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 37

No signs in JC & PE

  in EF

Our variant suggestion

Lack of dynamic indications in PE may be attributed to a drop in attention span at the time of writing the bar introducing the repetition, not written out. One may confirm or suspect signs of distraction in a few different details of notation, cf. the remarks concerning the R.H. and the beginning and end of the bar in the part of the L.H. Due to this fact, we propose the signs appearing in analogous bars 10 and 18, as well as in EF.

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues:

notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins