Page: 
Source: 
p. 2, b. 19-35
p. 1, b. 1-18
p. 2, b. 19-35
p. 3, b. 36-51
p. 4, b. 52-67
p. 5, b. 68-85
p. 6, b. 86-103
Main text
Main text
JC - Jędrzejewicz Copy
PE - First Polish Edition
EF - Editions by Fontana
FEF - French edition by Fontana
GEF - German edition by Fontana
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
JC - Jędrzejewicz Copy
PE - First Polish Edition
EF - Editions by Fontana
FEF - French edition by Fontana
GEF - German edition by Fontana
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 23

Rhythm in JC, literal reading

Rhythm in EF, possible interpretation of JC

Rhythm in PE, other interpretation of JC

In the main text we give the evident, faultlessly written rhythm of PE (together with the slur combining the final with the chord in the next bar). The version of JC includes an error (7 quavers in a bar), however, it is not said that it must have been in [AI]. If this was the case, it has to be the rhythm of EF that would correspond to Chopin's intentions. However, if the rhythmic error had already been in [AI], the version of EF would have been only one of the attempts to guess Chopin's intentions. Therefore, the intended version of [AI] could be generally compatible with the text of PE – one should only correct the erroneous notation by adding a quaver flag to the last (by the way, it would correspond to subscribing the note under the part of the R.H. in JC).

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Errors of JC

notation: Rhythm