Page: 
Source: 
p. 2, b. 19-35
p. 1, b. 1-18
p. 2, b. 19-35
p. 3, b. 36-51
p. 4, b. 52-67
p. 5, b. 68-85
p. 6, b. 86-103
Main text
Main text
JC - Jędrzejewicz Copy
PE - First Polish Edition
EF - Editions by Fontana
FEF - French edition by Fontana
GEF - German edition by Fontana
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
JC - Jędrzejewicz Copy
PE - First Polish Edition
EF - Editions by Fontana
FEF - French edition by Fontana
GEF - German edition by Fontana
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 29

JC, literal reading

JC (possible interpretation) & EF

PE

The notation of the sustained bass note, read literally, is unclear in JC (and probably also in draft [AI]), yet there are no major doubts as to how to correct it. We observe one of the more invasive possibilities of improving the original notation in EF. In the main text we give the undoubtedly later improved notation of PE (originally in the treble clef). All manners of notation featured in the sources result in the same sound effect.  

See b. 25-27

Compare the passage in the sources »

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information

issues: Errors of JC

notation: Rhythm