Page: 
Source: 
p. 2, b. 19-35
p. 1, b. 1-18
p. 2, b. 19-35
p. 3, b. 36-51
p. 4, b. 52-67
p. 5, b. 68-85
p. 6, b. 86-103
Main text
Main text
JC - Jędrzejewicz Copy
PE - First Polish Edition
EF - Editions by Fontana
FEF - French edition by Fontana
GEF - German edition by Fontana
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
JC - Jędrzejewicz Copy
PE - First Polish Edition
EF - Editions by Fontana
FEF - French edition by Fontana
GEF - German edition by Fontana
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 21-22

The sources differ in the details of the notation of "harmonic legato". In the previous version, the second semiquavers of the groups are extended to the value of a crotchet, except for the last group in bar 21, in which there is no relevant extension (see also the note related to bar 22). In the later version of PE, all those notes are dotted quavers. One could wonder whether Chopin changed here the performance (the second notes of each group were supposed to slightly overlap the next harmony in the previous version) or he just improved the notation, bearing in mind the same performance from the beginning (therefore, the original notation would be simpler, yet less precise).

In GEF there are no extensions in the 1st group in bar 21, which is a patent error (cf. analogous bar 48, in which the relevant extensions are marked).

Compare the passage in the sources »

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in Fontana's editions

notation: Rhythm