Page: 
Source: 
p. 5, b. 18-26
p. 1
p. 2
p. 3, b. 1-8
p. 4, b. 9-17
p. 5, b. 18-26
p. 6, b. 27-35
p. 7, b. 36-57
p. 8, b. 58-67
p. 9, b. 68-76
p. 10, b. 77-87
PE - First Polish Edition
Main text
JC - Jędrzejewicz Copy
PE - First Polish Edition
EF - Editions by Fontana
FEF - French edition by Fontana
GEF - German edition by Fontana
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
JC - Jędrzejewicz Copy
PE - First Polish Edition
EF - Editions by Fontana
FEF - French edition by Fontana
GEF - German edition by Fontana
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF PE - First Polish Edition


  b. 22

Tied b2 in JC

Repeated b2 in #FE

Rest in PE

Our suggestion

At the beginning of the bar, both JC and EF have a bquaver (without any performance markings). The note in JC is linked with a slur with the previous bat the end of bar 21; the slur seems to sustain the note. In the same place, PE has a quaver rest, which, according to us, was erroneously inserted instead of a note (the engraver's error would consist in repeating the rest featured after the aquaver before it). In the main text we propose a version in which the described possible error of PE was corrected on the basis of the remaining sources. At the same time, we consider a possible in this context staccato dot over the note. 

Learn more »

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: Errors in PE

notation: Pitch