![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Omission of current key accidentals
b. 5-6
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
In JC, there are no flats lowering a and a1 into a category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Cautionary accidentals , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors of JC |
|
b. 19
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
In JC there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors of JC , Inaccuracies in PE |
|
b. 75
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
None of the sources has the category imprint: Interpretations within context issues: Accidentals in different octaves , Omission of current key accidentals |
|
b. 78-80
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
In the entire A major fragment, it is only EF that has a correct notation, as far as the accidentals are concerned (however, we add both signs in the 3rd triplet in bar 80 and the natural in the 5th triplet, required in accordance with the rules adopted by us). PE lacks some of the signs, which, however, does not have any impact on determining the correct text; similarly in JC, where there are only few necessary signs. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves , Omission of current key accidentals , Inaccuracies in JC |
|
b. 87
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
 
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources |