|
b. 66
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
PE has a quaver rest in this place, which is a patent error. The same applies to bar 102. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Source & stylistic information issues: Errors in PE |
||||||||||
|
b. 67
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
The compatibility of the version of JC and PE, in which the 5th semiquaver is a f category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||||
|
b. 67
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
In the main text we give the slurs of PE. In the remaining sources, the notation is less accurate in this regard. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||||
|
b. 67
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
Lack of the grace note in PE does not seem to be a mistake – Chopin probably resigned from it, while writing [A] (maybe he did not want to repeat the ploy from bar 16 and analog.?). It is hard to determine which form of the grace note – a crotchet or a slashed quaver – was featured in [AI]. Moreover, Chopin was not too accurate in writing grace notes: small non-slashed quavers, and even crotchets, may sometimes indicate short ornaments, which, according to the rules, should have a form of a slashed quaver. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||||
|
b. 67
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
In the main text we give the accent over the crotchet visible in PE and most probably coming from [A]. In EF, a similar effect was marked with the help of a pair of category imprint: Differences between sources |
in 
in 