|
b. 60-61
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
The slurs embracing the motifs on the 1st beat of those bars (in both hands) appear in PE (we do not take into account the slur in the R.H. in bar 60, which we consider in the note concerning the rhythm). In EF, there are no slurs in bar 61, whereas in JC, there are no slurs at all in those bars. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in PE |
||||||||||
|
b. 60
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors of JC |
||||||||||
|
b. 61
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
In the main text we consider cresc. which appears only in the base source, PE. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||||
|
b. 62
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
In the main text we follow the base source, probably reflecting the latest Chopin's intention. However, an accidental omission of the arpeggio sign in PE cannot be totally excluded. The wavy line in JC is written after the chord. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||||
|
b. 62
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
In JC, the octave in the L.H. at the beginning of the bar is an erroneous crotchet. category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Errors of JC |
