Issues : Inaccuracies in JC
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »
b. 62
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
In JC, there is no raising b into b, which is a patent oversight. category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Inaccuracies in JC |
||||||
b. 62
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
In JC, there is no lowering a into a, which is an obvious oversight. category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Inaccuracies in JC |
||||||
b. 67
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in PE , Inaccuracies in JC |
||||||
b. 68-69
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
The rhythmic notation of the 2nd and 3rd beats of those bars cause substantial problems as in bars 52-53 and analog. The analysis of the notation of JC suggests that Chopin initially wrote only four quavers in each hand in [AI] and then, in a simplified manner, separated some of the notes by extending their stems over the beams (a similar notation is to be found in the finished autograph of the Polonaise in F minor, WN 12, bars 23-24). The notation of EF is an alternative attempt to decipher the notation of [AI]. For the main text we adopt the notation of PE with a clearly highlighted melodic voice. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in JC |
||||||
b. 70
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
In JC, there is no cautionary bass clef at the end of the great stave. category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Inaccuracies in JC |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »