Issues : Inaccuracies in PE
|
b. 30
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
In JC and PE, the entire 1st chord of the bar is written as a quaver (on one stem). The comparison of the notation with the one of analogous bars 26 and 28 leads to an argument confirming the correctness of the double-voice notation of EF, which we give in the main text. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in PE |
||||||||||
|
b. 32-34
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
Five category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in PE |
||||||||||
|
b. 33
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
The sign of accent, visible only in PE, is reversed to the left. Therefore, its way of interpretation is not entirely clear. In the main text we propose an interpretation assuming an error of the sign's reversal. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Sign reversal , Inaccuracies in PE |
||||||||||
|
b. 38
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
In the previous sources, a similar version to the version of analogous bar 11 (JC) or the same one (EF) is written out. In the main text we give the clearly different version of PE, repeated from bar 11 (bar 38 is the first one out of the ones marked as Dal Segno). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in PE |
||||||||||
|
b. 39
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in PE |
in 
