Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Verbal indications
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


Verbal indications

b. 16

composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major

No indication in JC & EF

 in PE

..

We consider  featured only in PE to be authentic.

category imprint: Differences between sources

b. 19

composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major

No indication in JC & EF

leggieriss. in PE

..

The indication leggieriss., featured in PE, probably comes from [A] and constitutes one of a few improvements of notation introduced by Chopin into this autograph in the present bar. Cf. the remark concerning dynamic markings or slurs.

category imprint: Differences between sources

b. 21

composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major

No indication in JC & EF

in PE

..

In the main text we include poco agitato from PE

category imprint: Differences between sources

b. 25

composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major

No marking in JC & PE

 in EF

..

The credibility of , visible in EF at the beginning of the bar, seems to be dubious due to the lack of signs confirming the accent in this place ( at the end of bar 24 and analogous remain in accordance with the slurs and accents).

category imprint: Differences between sources

b. 25

composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major

No markings in JC & EF

 in PE

..

 given in the main text appears only in PE; however, there is no reason to question its authenticity.

category imprint: Differences between sources