Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


Articulation, Accents, Hairpins

b. 15

composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major

No signs in JC & EF

  in PE

..

In the main text we consider the   signs which are present in PE. Cf. bars 13-14

category imprint: Differences between sources

b. 16

composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major

No markings in JC & EF

Slurred dots in PE

..

We include the almost certainly authentic articulation markings in PE.

category imprint: Differences between sources

b. 16

composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major

No mark in JC & PE

Accent in EF

..

The accent of EF is most probably non-authentic, although it undoubtedly corresponds to the natural phrasing of this fragment.

category imprint: Differences between sources

b. 18

composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major

No sign in JC & PE

 in EF

Our variant suggestion

..

The  hairpins are featured only in EF. As in analogous bar 10 a respective sign is present also in PE, in the main text we propose a variant solution.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

b. 19

composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major

No mark in JC

 in EF

Vertical accent in PE

..

In the main text we give the vertical accent present in the base source, PE. In this context, the sign in EF should rather be interpreted as a long accent.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Long accents , Vertical accents