Pitch
b. 66
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
In JC, the bass clef is not restored, which is a patent mistake. The same applies to bar 102. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors of JC |
||||||||||
b. 67
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
The compatibility of the version of JC and PE, in which the 5th semiquaver is a f, points to the error (or revision) of EF. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||||
b. 67
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
Lack of the grace note in PE does not seem to be a mistake – Chopin probably resigned from it, while writing [A] (maybe he did not want to repeat the ploy from bar 16 and analog.?). It is hard to determine which form of the grace note – a crotchet or a slashed quaver – was featured in [AI]. Moreover, Chopin was not too accurate in writing grace notes: small non-slashed quavers, and even crotchets, may sometimes indicate short ornaments, which, according to the rules, should have a form of a slashed quaver. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||||
b. 67
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in PE , Inaccuracies in JC |
||||||||||
b. 67
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: Cautionary accidentals |