![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Errors of JC
b. 72
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
In JC, lack of the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of JC |
||||||||||
b. 72-73
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of JC |
||||||||||
b. 74
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
The pitch and possible hold of the 2nd quaver of the bar raise doubts in the sources. Both in JC and in PE, when read literally, the note is a non-sustained d In the main text we give probably the only authentic version, written faultlessly in EF. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors of JC , Errors in PE |
||||||||||
b. 74-75
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
In JC there is no octave sign in those bars. It is probably an error, which is revealed by the analogy with the shape of figurations in bars 70-71, as well as by an unequivocal oversight of the octave sign in bar 71. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors of JC |
||||||||||
b. 76
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
JC has an erroneous tie in the L.H. on the first bar of the beat – there is only one tie written for the entire group. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Rhythmic errors , Errors of JC |