data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
b. 29
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
JC has an erroneous a1 (with a category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Cautionary accidentals , Errors of JC |
|||||
b. 29-31
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
In bars 29 and 31 we add a cautionary category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Cautionary accidentals |
|||||
b. 30
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
In JC and PE, the entire 1st chord of the bar is written as a quaver (on one stem). The comparison of the notation with the one of analogous bars 26 and 28 leads to an argument confirming the correctness of the double-voice notation of EF, which we give in the main text. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in PE |
|||||
b. 31
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Dotted or even rhythm |
|||||
b. 31
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
In the main text we consider the longer crotchet resounding of the g bass note, indicated only in PE, as compatible with the performance manner of similar figures in bars 25, 27, and 29. category imprint: Differences between sources |