Page: 
Source: 
p. 5, b. 199-238
p. 1, b. 1-47
p. 2, b. 48-98
p. 3, b. 99-158
p. 4, b. 159-198
p. 5, b. 199-238
p. 6, b. 239-270
p. 7, b. 271-306
p. 8, b. 307-347
p. 9, b. 348-398
p. 10, b. 399-446
p. 11, b. 447-484
p. 12, b. 485-528
p. 13, b. 529-565
p. 14, b. 566-604
p. 15, b. 605-649
Main text
Main text
GC - Gutmann's copy
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Second German edition
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
GC - Gutmann's copy
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Second German edition
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 203-230

Slurs in EE & FE

Slurs in GC, possible contextual interpretation

Slurs in GE

The interpretation of slur beginnings in GC is as difficult here as it was in the case of bar 159 and analogous bars – the slurs begin on the first crotchet. Only in bar 219, the last one in the system, the slur is missing altogether which is doubtless due to oversight, as the slur in 220 suggests continuation. In GE, three out of four slurs begin on the quavers (and also slurs were added for the L.H.). In our main text we give the slurring of EE and FE, as it is both convincing and error-free.

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions, Errors of GC

notation: Slurs