Page: 
Source: 
p. 11, b. 410-476
p. 1
p. 2
p. 3, b. 1-46
p. 4, b. 47-90
p. 5, b. 91-138
p. 6, b. 139-186
p. 7, b. 187-242
p. 8, b. 243-283
p. 9, b. 284-335
p. 10, b. 336-409
p. 11, b. 410-476
p. 12, b. 477-520
p. 13, b. 521-564
p. 14, b. 565-604
p. 15, b. 605-649
p. 16
GC - Gutmann's copy
Main text
GC - Gutmann's copy
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Second German edition
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
GC - Gutmann's copy
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Second German edition
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF GC - Gutmann's copy

Original in: Biblioteka Narodowa, Warsaw


  b. 431

Short accent in EE & GC (→GE)

No mark in FE

Our suggestion—a long accent

Similarly to the corresponding b. 89, we believe a long accent to be musically justified and, taking into account possible inaccuracies in reading the autograph, possibly accepted as a source.

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Long accents

notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins