Page: 
Source: 
p. 9, b. 340-400
p. 1
p. 2
p. 3, b. 1-58
p. 4, b. 59-114
p. 5, b. 115-171
p. 6, b. 172-232
p. 7, b. 233-287
p. 8, b. 288-339
p. 9, b. 340-400
p. 10, b. 401-475
p. 11, b. 476-541
p. 12, b. 542-590
p. 13, b. 591-649
p. 14
FE1 - First French edition
Main text
GC - Gutmann's copy
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Second German edition
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
GC - Gutmann's copy
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Second German edition
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF FE1 - First French edition

Original in: Bibliothèque Nationale, Paris


  b. 375

ten. in EE & GC (→GE)

No indication in FE

Lack of the ten. marking in FE may result from misinterpretation of the beginning of an abbreviated notation in [A2] (it is most probable that Chopin used the same abbreviation as in [A1]). In a corresponding b. 33 the marking is found FE.

Compare the passage in the sources »

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE

notation: Verbal indications