Issues : Errors in GE
b. 76-89
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
The sources differ here both with respect to the type of accents above the minims of the highest voice (short in EE and GC or long in FE) and to their occurrence in particular bars:
In the editors' opinion, the accent that FE has in bar 80 may have been placed there by mistake, and was meant to be placed in bar 81. Allowing for that possibility leads us to put forward the following proposal as an alternative to the main text: 11 accents in bars 76-79, 81, 83-87 and 89. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Errors in GE |
|||||||||||||||
b. 120
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
The minim in the highest voice is not very legible in GC (it was probably corrected from d sharp1 to e1), so in GE it was misread as d sharp1 . category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Inaccuracies in GC |
|||||||||||||||
b. 123-124
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE , Errors in GE |
|||||||||||||||
b. 154-155
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In #KG, the tie sustaining a flat is only present in bar 155 (in a new line). This was probably the reason why GE1 did not have it at all. The error was corrected in GE2. category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Errors in GE , Inaccuracies in GC |
|||||||||||||||
b. 169-170
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
The slur is GE (in both hands) are discontinued here. This is clearly an error caused probably by the erroneous reading of the slur and octave sign in GC. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |