Issues : GE revisions

b. 167-168

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

All'ottava sign in EE, FE & GE

No sign in GC

..

Missing in GC is the octave sign in the L.H. part. That obvious error was corrected in GE.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions , Errors of GC

b. 187-191

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

No L.H. slur in EE, GC & FE

Slur in GE

..

Just like in preceding bars, a slur in the L.H. was arbitrarily added in GE, with the scope corresponding to the scope of the authentic slur in the R.H.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions

b. 203-230

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

Slurs in EE & FE

Slurs in GC, possible contextual interpretation

Slurs in GE

..

The interpretation of slur beginnings in GC is as difficult here as it was in the case of bar 159 and analogous bars – the slurs begin on the first crotchet. Only in bar 219, the last one in the system, the slur is missing altogether which is doubtless due to oversight, as the slur in 220 suggests continuation. In GE, three out of four slurs begin on the quavers (and also slurs were added for the L.H.). In our main text we give the slurring of EE and FE, as it is both convincing and error-free.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions , Errors of GC

b. 210

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

Octave in EE & GC (→GE1)

b in the chord in FE & GE2

..

The version of FE, subsequently copied in GE2, seems less fortunate than the more subtle version of EE and GC (→GE1).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions

b. 274

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

..

A cautionary  before a2 was added in GE. The corresponding sign visible in EE is also probably the reviser's addition, yet surely justified in the context. 

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals