Issues : Errors in EE
|
b. 250
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
Absence of the arpeggio mark in EE is probably an error, yet the possibility that it is the first (original) notation cannot be entirely ruled out. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |
||||||||
|
b. 266
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
The absence of the arpeggio wavy line in EE is probably an error, yet we cannot rule out the possibility that this was the initial version of the notation here. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |
||||||||
|
b. 270
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: Errors in EE |
||||||||
|
b. 275
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In EE, the dashes defining the scope of the diminuendo end as early as bar 274. This is most probably an oversight, as in that edition we find no performance markings (apart from slurs) until bar 286. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |
||||||||
|
b. 277-278
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
Lack of the cresc. indication in EE is most probably an error (see the note to bar 275). Lack of the dashes delimiting the cresc. scope in GE is an error beyond any doubt. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |
