Issues : Inaccuracies in GC
|
b. 166-167
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In GC (→GE) the slur ends just above the last chord of bar 166, which definitely fails to match Chopin's intentions. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GC |
|||||||
|
b. 172-175
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
The slur in GC – as is the case in bars 166 and 182 – does not go beyond the bar line. However, the end of the slur here is clearly closer to the chord in bar 175 than that in bar 174, which was the reason why in GE it was interpreted as reaching the 1st beat of bar 175, in line with the remaining sources. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GC |
|||||||
|
b. 180-183
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In GC (→GE) the slur ends above the last chord of bar 182. This is most probably an innacuracy, as in bars 166 and 174. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GC |
|||||||
|
b. 211
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In GC, the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GC |
|||||||
|
b. 216-219
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
As the main text we give the definitely correct slur of EE. The slur of GC is not accurate and, when read literally, it only embraces three bars, which is what we can see in GE. Moreover, GE - just like FE - has the slur moved to the bottom and placed under the note heads. That revision, typically introduced by engravers, is not without influence on the meaning of that articulation mark. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Placement of markings , Inaccuracies in GC |
in 
