Issues : Long accents
b. 117
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
Only GC (→GE) has the accent mark, which makes it even more difficult to determine the type of accent intended by Chopin. We assume that a long accent was meant here, as was used in analogous bar 35. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
||||||||
b. 139
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
||||||||
b. 147
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we give a long accent, following GC (→GE). In EE the accent mark is short, in FE there is no accent at all. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
||||||||
b. 152-154
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
GC and FE clearly have long accents, EE – short ones. The marks in GE are unclear - shorter than those in bar 131 or 147, yet longer than those in bar 139. We assume them to be long accents, just like it was done in GC. category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: Long accents |
||||||||
b. 287
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
The accent form intended by Chopin is hard to determine: it is rather short in EE and rather long in FE and GE. The accent in GC can be interpreted both ways. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents |