Issues : Errors of GC
|
b. 75-89
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In bars 75, 78-79, 81-87 and 89 in GC minims in the R.H. have no augmenting dots. That inaccuracy of notation can sometimes be found in Chopin's writing, yet in this instance it is definitely the copyist's error. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Errors of GC |
|||||
|
b. 91
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
GC has the third a2-c sharp3 in the upper voice. The fact that EE and FE consistently have a different version testifies to Gutmann's error, quite often to be found in his copies (cf. bar 100). GE also has the correct version. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Terzverschreibung error , GE revisions , Errors of GC |
|||||
|
b. 98
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
GC has no category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Accidentals in different octaves , Errors in EE , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors of GC |
|||||
|
b. 100
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
GC has the chord e2-g sharp2-a2-c sharp3 here. The error was corrected in GE. Gutmann made an identical mistake in bar 91. category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: GE revisions , Errors of GC |
|||||
|
b. 122
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
Missing in GC and FE are the naturals cancelling the sharping of e to e sharp before the last crotchet of the bar, which is an obvious error. EE and GE have the correct version, consistent with the analogous bars 40 and 382. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors of GC |
3-e3 in 
raising f sharp1 to f double sharp1. That obvious inaccuracy was corrected in 
raising a1 to a sharp1.