Slurs
|
b. 604
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 605-608
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
The slur over these bars exists only in GC in bars 573-576, which here are repeated with a change of the beginning. Since the slur in GC begins in b. 604 on the previous page on the last chord. A question arises here how to connect this slur with a slur over the four-bar section in 605-608. We assume them to be one slur, and as such it is the copied in GE2 (in GE1 there are no slurs in bars 604-607, which is an obvious error. However, another solution may be proposed here where only bars 605-608 are slurred and the slur in b. 604 ends on the sixth beginning in b. 605. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 605
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor category imprint: issues: Inaccuracies in GC |
|||||||||||
|
b. 606-610
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
The #E - without slurs - most probably copies the initial stage of the noatation of motifs of LH in bars 606 and 609-610. In the main text we present the consistent notation of slurs in GC (→GE) and FE. Cf. bars 573-574 and 577-578. category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||||||
|
b. 609-616
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we present the GC slurring as the most precise one. Both EE and FE most probably copy the earlier stages of slurring these bars. The GE slur represents the literal reading of slightly imprecise notation of GC at the transition to a new line (bars 580-581) category imprint: Differences between sources |
