Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
|
b. 375
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
We believe that both the short accent in EE and hairoin in GE result from misunderstanding of the base text notation. In the main text we present a long accent based on GC and FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
||||||||
|
b. 377
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
The short accent in EE, given the lack of a note to be accented, must an inaccuracy of notation as there is a long accent here in both GC and FE. Lack of accent in GE must be an element of revision based on an assumption that in GC the tie on g category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 383-384
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
It is hard to consider a longer mark in GE as an accurate copy of the GC notation (in any case, in bars 41-42 the same notation was read more accurately), while a long accent present in EE may exemplify Chopin's intentions. In the main text we present a version based on two consistent sources, GC and FE that most probably originated from the two autographs. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||||
|
b. 388
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
The staccato dots in GE must have been added by the editor, however, they may most certainly be performed (compare authentic staccato marks in corresponding bars 31, 113 and 129). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 389-390
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
category imprint: Differences between sources |
in 
in 