data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
The ending of the slur in A is an example of the situation in which neither the graphic shape nor the musical sense allows for the choice of the notation that could be considered intended by Chopin: the slur ends between the notes, and both slurs may mean the same in this context. The comparison with similar phrases does not bring any new clues either – in bar 51 the slur ends on a crotchet, and in bar 113 on a semiquaver. However, a broader analysis of slur endings in similar situations slightly tips the balance in favour of a longer slur. Chopin, despite the fact that he generally wrote his slurs hastily and carelessly, did several times correct such early-ending slurs extending them to reach the crotchet.
category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness
issues: Inaccurate slurs in A
notation: Slurs
Back to note