Page: 
Source: 
p. 4, b. 89-120
p. 1, b. 1-28
p. 2, b. 29-56
p. 3, b. 57-88
p. 4, b. 89-120
Main text
Main text
A - Autograph
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Revised impression of GE2
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French Edition
FED - Dubois copy
FES - Stirling copy
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English Edition
EE2 - Second impression of EE1
EE3 - Revised impression of EE2
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
A - Autograph
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Revised impression of GE2
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French Edition
FED - Dubois copy
FES - Stirling copy
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English Edition
EE2 - Second impression of EE1
EE3 - Revised impression of EE2
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 109-112

A single slur in GE (→FE)

Two slurs in A and EE

Taken literally, A has got two slurs in the L.H. embracing bars 109-110 and 111-112. In spite of that, in GE (→FE) the entire four-bar section is embraced by a single slur This seems to be a fortunate inaccuracy, as there are no grounds for applying different slurring than the one used in analogous bars 105-108 (and only in the L.H. probably - see the note concerning the R.H.). EE has got two slurs, which may have been influenced by the R.H. slurring.

Compare the passage in the sources »

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions, Inaccuracies in GE, Inaccurate slurs in A

notation: Slurs