Page: 
Source: 
p. 1, b. 1-22
p. 1, b. 1-22
p. 2, b. 23-52
Main text
Main text
AO - Autograph Oury
AR - Autograph Rotschild
AE - Autograph Eszterhazy
AK - Autograph Krudner
AG - Autograph Gavard
CX - Copy of Autograph Eszterhazy
CY - Copy of Autograph Gavard
CC - Czartoryscy copy
F - Fontana Version
FC - Fontana copy
PE - First Polish edition
FEF - Fontana's French edition
GEF - Fontana's German edition
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
AO - Autograph Oury
AR - Autograph Rotschild
AE - Autograph Eszterhazy
AK - Autograph Krudner
AG - Autograph Gavard
CX - Copy of Autograph Eszterhazy
CY - Copy of Autograph Gavard
CC - Czartoryscy copy
F - Fontana Version
FC - Fontana copy
PE - First Polish edition
FEF - Fontana's French edition
GEF - Fontana's German edition
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 4

In AG, the text of the chord on the 2nd beat in the L.H. is ambiguous. Most probably, it lacks in c1, while the dash visible in this place results from "restarting" the pen, which - by analysing the entire autograph - would often leave two thin dashes and a blank space between them instead of a homogenous, full dash. Chopin may have automatically written two dashes in this place, trying to "restart" the pen with quick movements.

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues:

notation: Pitch

Missing markers on sources: FC