Page: 
Source: 
p. 3, b. 32-42
p. 1, b. 1-17
p. 2, b. 18-31
p. 3, b. 32-42
Main text
Main text
A - Autograph
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE1
IE - Italian edition
IE1 - First Italian edition
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
A - Autograph
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE1
IE - Italian edition
IE1 - First Italian edition
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 35

Crotchet e1 in A

Quaver e1 in GE (→FE,EE,IE)

The notation of the sextuplet that ends the bar does not contain a mistake in A, hence we keep it in the main text, although it is not entirely clear why the two a1 quavers should be separated as the top voice. The sextuplet's interpretation of GE (→FE,EE,IE) is also justified, as in many cases A stems do not reach their respective beams (examples thereof are to be found even in this bar), and it could have been considered that the e1 stem pointing upwards should reach the beam of the top quaver beaming. This version suggests that the main melodic line is constituted by the following notes: a1-e1-a1-b1-c2, which seems musically convincing.

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in A

notation: Rhythm

Missing markers on sources: A, GE1, IE1, FE1, EE1, EE2