data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e59ea/e59ea164cc09fb20651e39bd84b5beefb140cf1e" alt=""
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
2 |
![]() |
![]() |
2 |
![]() |
![]() |
2 |
Even though the extension of the e note on the 8th quaver of the bar to a dotted crotchet seems illogical, in the main text we keep the notation of the sources, as it is difficult to clearly indicate the mistake Chopin could have committed. We suggest two most likely solutions, according to us, as alternative versions. In the main text we add a stem to the f quaver in bar 15, which prolongs it to a crotchet, as in bar 14.
GE (→FE,EE,IE) repeated the Chopinesque version of the prolonged e notes; however, the extension to the f note in bar 14 was omitted, probably by inattention.
category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions
issues: GE revisions, Rhythmic errors, Errors of A
notation: Rhythm