data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e59ea/e59ea164cc09fb20651e39bd84b5beefb140cf1e" alt=""
In A the middle note of the 2nd triplet is devoid of an accidental, which gives c2. What is more, the defining c
2 is before the 2nd semiquaver of the nonuplet further on in the bar, which seems to confirm the fact that the discussed note should be a c2. On the other hand, a strong argument for an oversight of the
before this note is provided by the penultimate semiquaver in the bar, b
1, and not b
1 – the 1st and 2nd beat is a transposition of the 4th and 5th beat by a second up (from F
to G
), and the counterpart of this b
1 in the analysed place is c
2, and not c2.
Compare the passage in the sources»
category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions
issues: GE revisions, Omission of current key accidentals, Errors of A
notation: Pitch