data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e59ea/e59ea164cc09fb20651e39bd84b5beefb140cf1e" alt=""
In the main text we keep the Chopinesque abbreviation and its position in A (we only correct the manifest orthographic error – one 'g' is missing). There is no reason for moving the indication to the beginning of the bar, as it was done in GE (→FE,EE,IE). Writing the abbreviation in full in EE was rational, although it is highly likely that it does not exactly correspond to Chopin's intention – see the note on this abbreviation in the Variations in B, Op. 12, bar 14.
In IE the indication's orthography was modernised – cf. the Concerto in F minor, Op. 21, mov. III, bar 81.
Compare the passage in the sources»
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources
issues: EE revisions, GE revisions, Errors of A,
notation: Verbal indications