Page: 
Source: 
p. 9, b. 163-183
p. 1, b. 1-22
p. 2, b. 23-42
p. 3, b. 43-62
p. 4, b. 63-81
p. 5, b. 82-103
p. 6, b. 104-124
p. 7, b. 125-142
p. 8, b. 143-162
p. 9, b. 163-183
p. 10, b. 184-206
p. 11, b. 207-227
p. 12, b. 228-248
Main text
Main text
A - Autograph
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE1
IE - Italian edition
IE1 - First Italian edition
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
A - Autograph
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE1
IE - Italian edition
IE1 - First Italian edition
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 177

Dots in A, possible interpretation 

Wedges in GE (→FE,EE,IE)

The staccato marks with which Chopin marked the sequence of thirds in A can be interpreted as dots or wedges. According to us, Chopin wrote dots, which he then turned into wedges, or the other way round – wedges that he tried to replace by dots. Taking into account  dynamics and the clear wedges over the chords marked with  and  in bar 178, we consider dots to be more likely as the final markings. However, the wedges present in the sources can be considered an equally valid variant.

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

issues: Corrections in A, Wedges, Inaccuracies in A

notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins

Missing markers on sources: A, GE1, FE1, IE1, EE1, EE2